Effect of Transformational Leadership and Work Stress on Organizational Citizenship Behavior with Organizational Commitment as an Intervening Variable

Authors

  • Muhammad Fachruddin Arrozi
  • Charli Otman Tirtayasa
  • Nofiarni Nofiarni

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35654/ijnhs.v5i6.683

Keywords:

Transformational Leadership; work stress; Organizational Commitment; Organizational Citizenship Behavior

Abstract

Background. Organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) is defined as behavior that goes beyond formally defined roles and is not stated in the job description. Objective: The study aimed to examine the effect of Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) that are influenced by the Transformational Leadership of the Head of the Inpatient Room, work stress, and nurse organizational commitment simultaneously. Method: This research uses a survey method with an explanatory causality approach. Data was collected by using a questionnaire and tested using Multiple Linear Regression Analysis. Result: Transformational leadership, job stress, and organizational commitment significantly affect organizational citizenship behavior simultaneously. Transformational leadership is the biggest factor. Organizational commitment can mediate the effect of Transformational Leadership and work stress on Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Transformational leadership significantly affects Organizational Commitment, Work Stress significantly affects Organizational Commitment, Organizational Commitment significantly affects Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and Transformational Leadership significantly affects Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Work stress significantly affects Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Implication: This study helps hospital management to promote a more effective work culture through Transformational Leadership training, Organizational Citizenship Behavior of Heads of Inpatient rooms, and a new method of selecting new nurses recruitment by HRD and long-term prosocial improvement for senior employees

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Suraihi WA, Samikon SA, Al-Suraihi AA, Ibrahim II. Employee Turnover: Causes, Importance and Retention Strategies. European Journal of Business and Management Research. 2021; 6(3):1–10

de Geus CJC, Ingrams A, Tummers L, Pandey SK. Organizational Citizenship Behavior in the Public Sector: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda. Public Administration Review. 2020; 259-70.

MENPAN RB. Menteri Tjahjo Kumolo Serahkan Hasil Evaluasi Pelayanan Publik 2021, Bagaimana Hasilnya?”. 2022 08 Maret 2022. https://www.menpan.go.id/site/berita-terkini/menteri-tjahjo-kumolo-serahkan-hasil-evaluasi-pelayanan-publik-2021-bagaimana-hasilnya.

El Badawy TA, Trujillo-Reyes JC, Magdy MM. Exploring the Relationship between Organizational Culture, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour. International Journal of Human Resource Studies. 2016;6(4): 1-5 .https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v6i4.9939.

Bass BM, Riggio RE. Transformational Leadership: Second Edition.” Transformational Leadership: Second Edition. 2005; 1–282. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617095.

Organ D, Mackenzie SB, Podsakoff P. Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. 2016: 1-350

Kasraie S, Parsa S, Hassani M, Ghasem-Zadeh A. The Relationship between Quality of Work Life, Job Stress, Job Satisfaction and Citizenship Behavior in Oshnaviyeh Hospital’s Staff. Patient Saf Qual Improv. 2014; 2(2): 77-81

Paillé P. Perceived Stressful Work, Citizenship Behaviour and Intention to Leave the Organization in a High Turnover Environment: Examining the Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction. Journal of Management Research. 2010; 3(1) .https://doi.org/10.5296/jmr.v3i1.487.

Yu J, Park J, Hyun SS. Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Employees’ Work Stress, Well-Being, Mental Health, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and Employee-Customer Identification.” Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management. 2021; 30 (5): 529–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2021.18 67283.s

Saadeh IM, Suifan TS. Job Stress and Organizational Commitment in Hospitals: The Mediating Role of Perceived Organizational Support. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. 2020; 28(1):226-42. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-11-2018-1597.

Haque Ul, Aston J. A Relationship between Occupational Stress and Organisational Commitment of I.T Sector’s Employees in Contrasting Economies. Polish Journal of Management Studies. 2016;14(1):95–105. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2016.14.1.09.

Abdelmoteleb SA. A New Look at the Relationship Between Job Stress and Organizational Commitment: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Study. Journal of Business and Psychology. 2019; 34 (3): 321–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9543-z.

Iqbal A. Organizational Behavior Study Material: Quick Study Guide with Terminology, Definitions & Explanations (Management Revision Notes &Encyclopedia). 2021. Retrieved from: https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=0-IUEAAAQBAJ&pg=GBS.PT3&hl=en

Huo C, Akhtar MW, Safdar MA, Aslam K, Abbas K, Rafiq MH, Iqbal K. Transformational Leadership Spur Organizational Commitment among Optimistic Followers: The Role of Psychological Capital. International Journal of Organizational Leadership. 2010; 9:93–104. https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2020.60498.

Aprilani D, Rivai F, Maidin A, Noor NB, Muhammad L, Hamzah H. The Effect of Perceived Organizational Support and Organizational Commitment to Organizational Citizenship Behavior Nurse Dr. Tadjuddin Chalid.” Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education. 2021; 12 (12): 4138–46.

Pooja AA, Clercq DD, Belausteguigoitia I. Job Stressors and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Roles of Organizational Commitment and Social Interaction: Job Stressors and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 2016; 27(3): p.373-405

Huo C, Akhtar MW, Safdar MA, Aslam K, Abbas K, Rafiq MH, Iqbal K. Transformational Leadership Spur Organizational Commitment among Optimistic Followers: The Role of Psychological Capital. International Journal of Organizational Leadership. 2020; 9: 93–104

Manesh MH, Singh JGK, Hussain IAB. Transformational Leadership and Contextual Performance: A Quantitative Study among Nursing Staff in Kuala Lumpur. International Journal of management and sustainability. 2018; 7(2). Retrieved from: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/11/article/view/1045

Iqbal K, Fatima T, Naveed M. The Impact of Transformational Leadership on Nurses' Organizational Commitment: A Multiple Mediation Model. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology, and Education. 2020; 10 (1): 262–75. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe10010021.

Yang L-H, Yeh T-J. How Transformational Leadership Contributes To Employees’ Commitment To An. International Journal of Organizational Innovation. 2018; 11 (2): 270–79

Zhang X, Jiang X, Ni P, Li H, Li C, Zhou Q, Ou Z, Guo Y, Cao J. Association between resilience and burnout of front-line nurses at the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic: Positive and negative affect as mediators in Wuhan. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021;30(4):939-954. doi: 10.1111/inm.12847.

Eissenstat SJ, Lee Y. Understanding Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Counselor’s Role. International Journal of Workplace Health Management. 2017; 10 (6): 491–507.

https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-05-2017-0030.

Mojtabai R, Stuart EA, Hwang I, Susukida R, Eaton WW, Sampson N, Kessler RC. Long-term effects of mental disorders on employment in the National Comorbidity Survey ten-year follow-up. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015;50(11):1657-68. doi: 10.1007/s00127-015-1097-z.

Yanner, Bernarto I, Wuisan D. the effect of job stress, job satisfaction and organizational commitment on performance. Jurnal manajemen bisnis dan inovasi. 2020; 7(1): 92-102

Luturlean BS, Prasetio AP. Antecedents of employee’s affective commitment the direct effect of work stress and the mediation of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Management. 2019; 17(4): 697-712

Liu, Peng. (2018). "Transformational Leadership Research in China (2005–2015)." Chinese Education and Society 51 (5): 372–409.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10611932.2018.1510

Downloads

Published

2022-12-27