Relationship between Supervision and End of Life Care Documentation in Inpatient Room at Hospital in South Jakarta

Authors

  • Krisna Yetti Malawat Fundamental and Basic Human Needs Department, Faculty of nursing Universitas Indonesia
  • Azis Fahruji Master of Nursing, Leadership & Management of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia
  • Kuntarti Department of Nursing and Fundamental Nursing, Universitas Indonesia

Keywords:

Dimensions, Documentation, End of Life, Intensive, Supervision, Quality

Abstract

Introduction: Patients treated in hospitals with end-of-life patients are more likely to be in the intensive care room than patients treated in the standard care room because, if there is an end of life, they are moved to the inpatient room required the implementation of supervision on documenting the end of life care, so that the quality of service improves. Objective: To identify the relationship between supervision implementation and EoLC documentation in the intensive care room. Method: Cross-sectional design was used. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate were used to analyze. Results: The mean age was 35.68 ± 7.232 years, tenure 12.12 ± 7.623 years, 78.3% women, Nursing Diploma 64.2%, implementing nurses 95.8%, PNS 63.2%, PK2 44.8 % and have attended 55.7% training. The average supervision implementation was 51.20%, the technical dimension was 68.30%, the principal was 66.73%, the model was 64.47%, and the routine activities were 51.82%, and documentation was 74.17% EoLC. There is a significant relationship between supervision (techniques, principles, routine activities, and supervision models) with EoLC documentation. The dominant dimension of supervision is the supervision model with medium strength and a positive direction. There are three variables: gender, position, and supervision model can increase EoLC documentation by 27.8% (R2 = 0.278), while other variables can increase the rest. EoLC documentation equation = 75,479 + 3,763 Gender + (-8,366) Position + 2,108 Supervision Model. Conclusion: The nursing sector creates an SPO program to carry out supervision and documentation of EoLC to create effectiveness in nursing services that have an impact on patient quality and safety

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

(1) Margaret M. Heitkemper, Deborah Watkins Bruner, Jerry C. Jhonson JOK. National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement on Improving End-of-Life Care. In Washington: State-of-the-Science; 2004.

(2) Chan B. An Evaluation Of The Influence Of The Care ( Compassion And Respect At The End-Of-Life ) Program On Registered Nurses ’ Knowledge And Comfort About End-Of-Life Care And Care Delivery For Patients With Life-Limiting Illnesses. Azusa Pacific University; 2018.

(3) Jaelani. Hubungan Perawatan Pasien Menjelang Ajal Dengan Dokumentasi Keperawatan Di Rumah Sakit Wilayah Kota Cirebon. 2018;3(8):27–38.

(4) Farquharson J. Developing Documentation for End of Life Care. 2015;

(5) KARS. Standar nasional akreditasi rumah sakit. 1 ed. Jakarta: Komisi Akreditasi Rumah Sakit; 2017. 421 hal.

(6) Akemat BAK&. Model Praktik Keperawatan Profesional Jiwa. Jakarta: EGC; 2012. 305 hal.

(7) Heru Supriyanto Arwani. Manajemen Bangsal Rawat. Jakarta: EGC; 2006. 144 hal.

(8) Kayser-Jones J, Schell E, Lyons W, Kris AE, Chan J, Beard RL. Factors That Influence End-of-Life Care in Nursing Homes: The Physical Environment, Inadequate Staffing, and Lack of Supervision. Gerontologist. 2003;43(suppl_2):76–84.

(9) Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. End-of-life care in acute hospitals: A background paper. Acsqhc. Australia: NSQHS Standart; 2013. 52l.

(10) Afriani T, Haruti RTS, Gayatri D. Dukungan atasan dan teman sejawat mempengaruhi ekspektasi perawat dalam penerapan jenjang karir. J Keperawatan Indones. 2017;20(2):75–84.

(11) Nindyanto SIA, Sukesi N, Purnomo MAB. Pengaruh supervisi kepala ruang terhadap dokumentasi asuhan keperawatan di ruang rawat inap rsud ungaran. Karya Ilm S1 Ilmu Keperawatan. 2013;0(0).

(12) Tutik Sri Hariyati., Sutoto. ID. Kredensial dan rekredensial keperawatan sesuai SNARS (1st ed). 1 ed. Vol. 1, Mathematics Education Journal. Jakarta; 2018.

(13) Alrajhi A, Sormunen T, Alsubhi H. Factors Affecting Bedside Handover between Nurses in the Critical Care Area. IOSR J Nurs Heal Sci. 2018;7(4):53–64.

(14) Judge SPR& TA. Organizational Behavior. 17th ed. Vol. 17. British: published by Pearson Education; 2017. 500.

(15) Dewi R, Yetti K, Ayubi D. Supervisi Kepala Ruangan Berdasarkan Kelengkapan Pendokumentasian Asuhan Keperawatan. J Keperawatan Indones. 2008;12(3):187–92.

(16) Harmatiwi DD, Sumaryani S, Rosa EM. Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Supervisi Keperawatan di R umah Sakit Umum Daerah Panembahan Senopati Bantul. 2017;6(1):47–54.

(17) Hariyati RTS. Perencanaan pengembangan dan utilisasi tenaga keperawatan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers; 2014.

(18) Snowdon DA, Leggat SG, Taylor NF. Does clinical supervision of healthcare professionals improve the effectiveness of care and patient experience? A systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):1–11.

(19) Ratanto R, Mustikasari M, Kuntarti K. Pengembangan Karir Sebagai Faktor Paling Mempengaruhi Kinerja Perawat Pelaksana. J Keperawatan Indones. 2013;16(2):114–9.

(20) Kusuma C. Analisis Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pelaksanaan Supervisi Keperawatan di Ruang Rawat Inap Kelas 3 RSU PKU Muhammadiyah Bantul Yogyakarta. 2016;

(21) Gizaw A. Documentation Practice and associated factors among Nurses Working at JUMC. 2019;30.0 / Cha(1 April):54–61.

(22) Asamani JA, Amenorpe FD, Babanawo F, Ofei AMA. Nursing documentation of inpatient care in eastern Ghana. Br J Nurs. 2014;23(1):48–54.

(23) Siswanto LMH, Hariyati RTS, Sukihananto. Faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan kelengkapan pendokumentasian asuhan keperawatan. J keperawatan Indones. 2013;16(2):77–84.

(24) Bijani, Sadeghzadeh, Jeihooni KA, Seyyed Hannan K. Factors influencing poor nursing documentation from the perspective of nursing staff. Int J Med Res Heal Sci. 2016;5:717–8.

(25) Budu HI, Abalo EM, Bam VB, Agyemang DO, Noi S, Budu FA, et al. “I prefer a male nurse to a female nurse”: Patients’ preference for, and satisfaction with nursing care provided by male nurses at the Komfo Anokye teaching hospital. BMC Nurs. 2019;18(1):1–9.

(26) Amalia E, Herawati L, Nofriadi. Faktor-Faktor Kelengkapan Pendokumentasian Asuhan Keperawatan di Instalasi Rawat Inap RSUD Lubuk Sikaping. Pros Semin Kesehat Perintis. 2018;1(1).

(27) Widya N Widodo, Herlina Wungow RSH. Hubungan Peran Ketua Tim Dengan Kinerja Perawat Pelaksana Dalam Pendokumentasian Asuhan Keperawatan. e-journal Keperawatan (e-Kp). 2016;4(2):3–7.

(28) Sari Madonni, Erwin RW. Hubungan Penerapan Metode tim dengan Asuhan Keperawatan Pasien diruang rawat Inap. Cybrarians J. 2015;2(37):1–31.

(29) Ola AB, Abdullah R, Azis M. Pengaruh Status Kepegawaian dan Komitmen Organisasi terhadap Kinerja melalui Kepuasan Kerja di UPTD Puskesmaa Kajuara Kabupaten Bone. YUME J Manag. 2019;2(1).

(30) Min A, Kim IS. Relationship of Perception of Clinical Ladder System with Professional Self-Concept and Empowerment based on Nurses’ Clinical Career Stage. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2013;19(2):254.

(31) AASW. Supervision Standards. Australia: Australian Association of Social Workers; 2014. 1–15.

(32) Suarli S, Amalia Safitri YB. Manajemen Keperawatan: Dengan Pendekatan Praktis. Amalia Safitri RA, editor. Vol. 2. Jakarta: Erlangga; 2009. 186 hal.

Mohamed FR, Mohamed Ahmed H. Clinical supervision factors as perceived by the nursing staff. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2019;9(6):67.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-22 — Updated on 2021-01-18

Versions